Whose landWolastoqiyik and Mi'gmaq territories
Bas-Saint-Laurent (St. Lawrence south shore)
Cold-maritime south shore of the St. Lawrence estuary and the Appalachian foothills, on Wolastoqiyik and Mi'gmaq territory and in French. An older population, growing again since 2019, with a welcome agent in each of its eight MRCs: a place to be received by, through farm succession and village life, before it is a place to arrive in.
Land standing · qualitative, never scored
Wolastokuk, Gespe'gewa'gi and Nionwentsïo meet here, and no claim is settled. West of the Métis watershed lies Wolastokuk, the ancestral territory of the Wolastoqiyik (Maliseet) Wahsipekuk First Nation, whose small reserve is at Cacouna and which filed a comprehensive land claim with Canada and Québec in 2006. East and south are the Mi'gmaq of Gespe'gewa'gi (Listuguj, Gesgapegiag, Gespeg), who call their territory ancestral and unceded and whose own river-systems page names the Matapédia among the rivers of Gespe'gewa'gi. The Huron-Wendat Nation claims a territory, Nionwentsïo, that reaches east to beyond Rivière-du-Loup and takes in the Côte-du-Sud, Kamouraska and part of Témiscouata, on the strength of the 1760 treaty, and overlaps Wolastokuk. The Peace and Friendship Treaties the Wolastoqiyik and Mi'gmaq signed involved no surrender of land, and Canada's 2022 consultation map (illustrative, not definitive) shows their asserted territory running the whole south shore
Sources for this row (1)
- The Peace and Friendship Treaties were signed with the Mi'kmaq, Maliseet and Passamaquoddy before 1779 and did not involve First Nations surrendering rights to the lands and resources they had used and occupied. CIRNAC: Peace and Friendship Treaties (opens in a new tab)
Sources for this row (1)
- Bill 86 (2025) bars investment funds and buyers who are not a registered agricultural operation from acquiring farm land within 1,000 metres of an urbanisation perimeter without the commission's authorisation, and lets the Government lower the four-hectare non-resident threshold by regulation. Bill 86 (SQ 2025, c. 5), official English text (opens in a new tab)
Sources for this row (2)
- The region runs an official welcome and integration service, with Place aux jeunes agents (ages 18 to 35, including immigrants with a valid work permit) in each of the eight MRCs. S'établir au Bas-Saint-Laurent: accueil et intégration (opens in a new tab)
- ARTERRE offers accompaniment and matching between aspiring farmers and owners. ARTERRE (opens in a new tab)
Where the answer is not here
- Arriving to buy land on the south shore as though a treaty of cession had been made: Canada's own account says the Peace and Friendship Treaties signed with the Mi'kmaq and the Maliseet did not involve First Nations surrendering rights to the lands and resources they had used and occupied.
First conversations
Public bodies and protocols to read first. Pointers, not introductions.
Host nation or community
- Gesgapegiag Mi'gmaq First Nation (opens in a new tab) The Gesgapegiag Mi'gmaq First Nation's own site. checked 5 October 2026
- Listuguj Mi'gmaq Government (opens in a new tab) The Listuguj Mi'gmaq Government's own site. checked 5 October 2026
Land-access or welcome programme
- ARTERRE (opens in a new tab) Matching service between would-be farmers and farm or land owners. checked 5 October 2026
- Place aux jeunes en région (opens in a new tab) Promotes migration of young adults to the regions (18-35). checked 5 October 2026
- S'établir au Bas-Saint-Laurent (opens in a new tab) The region's official welcome and integration service: support at every stage of a move. checked 5 October 2026
These are pointers to public bodies. None of them has agreed to be contacted, and none is a person. Read first; ask how they want to be approached; never assume.
Assembled from public sources and checked on 2026-10-05. No nation or community named here has reviewed this entry.
How to arrive in Bas-Saint-Laurent (St. Lawrence south shore)Where arriving in a place would harm the community already there, the honest answer is not to go.
Every region in this tool is already someone’s home.What living here asks of you
Bas-Saint-Laurent asks you to arrive in French, through a farm or a village that is already here. The free welcome teams in all eight MRCs are the first door; Place aux jeunes serves ages 18 to 35, so a family or a group should ask first. Land is the slow door: no current regional price could be verified (Québec farmland values rose 4.8 percent in 2025), and financing a transfer was named a persistent difficulty when ARTERRE launched. A non-resident who means to settle can be authorised to buy 4 ha or more of farmland on condition of living in Québec 1,095 days within four years and being a citizen or permanent resident by the end of it. Under it all is ground that three nations still hold open, the Wolastoqiyik Wahsipekuk, the Mi'gmaq of Gespe'gewa'gi and the Huron-Wendat, and a forest under spruce budworm pressure: the affected area grew from 844,004 to 1,065,561 ha in 2025, though defoliation is not the same as tree death.
Place · around the reference point, 100 km
Lower St Lawrence south shore and the Notre-Dame Mountains
- Where it sits
- In the New England-Acadian forests, and partly the Eastern Canadian forests.
- Where the water goes
- Rimouski, Mitis and Trois-Pistoles to the estuary; Saint John (Madawaska) inland. Drains to St Lawrence estuary and Bay of Fundy. The region straddles a drainage divide.
Ecoregions: RESOLVE Ecoregions 2017 (CC BY 4.0), computed within 100 km of the region's reference point, not its footprint. Watershed named from the region dossier and checked against Natural Earth rivers.
A descriptive label written for this tool. The names of peoples and places belong under Whose land.
What lawful entry involves, in order
- Who may hold
- A person who does not reside in Québec needs the authorization of the Commission de protection du territoire agricole du Québec (CPTAQ) to acquire farm land of four hectares or more; the Government may lower that threshold by regulation. Bill 86 (2025, chapter 5) widened the net: it covers acquiring shares in a corporation one of whose assets is farm land, not only one whose principal asset is farm land, and it sets separate authorization grounds for investment funds, for buyers who will not register a farm operation within 1,000 metres of an urbanization perimeter, and for holdings above a cap to be set by regulation. Bill 86, SQ 2025, c. 5, An Act to ensure the long-term preservation and vitality of agricultural land, ss. 1, 63 (new s. 79.0.6) and explanatory notes (Publications du Québec)
- First claim
- The CPTAQ must authorise before the following acquisitions of farm land: by a non-resident of four hectares or more; by an investment fund (in force from 5 December 2024); by a buyer that is not a registered agricultural operation where the land is within 1,000 metres of an urbanization perimeter in a metropolitan community or an MRC in the groups set by decree (from 5 December 2024); and, once a regulation sets it, by a buyer whose total holdings would exceed the regulated area (Bill 86, new s. 79.0.6 and s. 114).
- Until the first decree under s. 79.0.5, the 1,000-metre ground applies to the municipalities in groups A to D of Schedule B (s. 105.5). In this region Rimouski-Neigette and Rivière-du-Loup are in group D; La Mitis, Kamouraska, Témiscouata, Les Basques, La Matanie and La Matapédia are in group F, which that interim rule does not cover.
- Direction
- Bill 86 was assented to on 25 March 2025 and, for its first two authorization grounds and the interim Schedule B rule, takes effect as of 5 December 2024. The third ground and the holding cap come into force only with the first regulation under it, and no decree under s. 79.0.5 or cap regulation was found, so the interim group lists are the rule in the text opened.tightening · as of 2026
- Start with the region's welcome network, not a parcel. The regional welcome page names a Place aux jeunes agent in each of the 8 MRCs for people aged 18 to 35 (immigrants with a valid work permit included), resources for people aged 36 and over, and personalised support for immigrants, with an organisation named for each MRC. It does not mention families, groups or farm succession, and Place aux jeunes' own site says its service is for the 18-35s, while its exploratory stays can be taken as a family or alone.
- If farming is the aim, register with ARTERRE, the matching service that accompanies and pairs aspiring farmers with landowners who wish to transfer or lease a farm; the Bas-Saint-Laurent is a participating region.
- Before buying farm land, work out which CPTAQ ground could apply: non-residency and four hectares or more; investment fund; or, in Rimouski-Neigette and Rivière-du-Loup, a buyer who will not register a farm operation within 1,000 metres of an urbanization perimeter. A buyer who declares that the land will be part of an agricultural operation registered in their name within the year after registration in the land register is granted authorization under the second ground.
- Learn whose land it is and meet the Nations before acting. The Wolastoqiyik Wahsipekuk First Nation, the only Wolastoqey nation in Québec, names Wolastokuk as its ancestral territory and records the loss of the Viger reserve lands in 1869; Listuguj states that Gespe'gewa'gi has been Mi'gmaq traditional territory since time immemorial, and the Mi'gmawei Mawiomi Secretariat says Mi'gma'gi remains unceded.
- An investment fund cannot acquire farm land in Québec without the CPTAQ's authorization, directly or indirectly (Bill 86, new s. 79.0.6).
- A non-resident cannot acquire farm land of four hectares or more without CPTAQ authorization, and an acquisition made in contravention of s. 79.0.6 is covered by the Act's nullity and penalty rules (Bill 86 explanatory notes and s. 79.0.6 amendments).
- The decree under s. 79.0.5 and the holding-cap regulation were not found; whether a decree has replaced the interim Schedule B groups since March 2025 is unknown.
- The full definition of non-resident in section 1 of the Act respecting the acquisition of farm land by non-residents was not opened (the official consolidation site refused scripted requests); only Bill 86's amendments and explanatory notes were read.
- The federal prohibition on the purchase of residential property by non-Canadians, and the Civil Code collective vehicles (co-operative, association, trust, emphyteusis), were not verified and are not stated.
- The MRC land-use plans, the municipal permit rules and the CPTAQ's own pages were not opened, so what a home or a group of homes needs on a given parcel is unknown.
- No regional farmland price from an official current source was found; the only regional figure (2019) is stale and is not used.
- Place aux jeunes serves ages 18 to 35, so a family or group arrival is a stated fit limit of that service; no source was opened for a group arrival route or for ARTERRE's results in the region.
- No Mi'gmaq source opened names the Matapédia valley (La Matapédia MRC), and no Wolastoqiyik page opened states the territory is unceded; the project's convention of treating the territory as unceded is not asserted as a legal finding here.
- The outcomes of the New Brunswick Wolastoqey and Mi'gmaq title cases are not transferred to Québec.
Context, not adviceOrientation from public sources, not legal advice. Check current law with a local professional before acting. Sources: Bill 86, SQ 2025, c. 5, An Act to ensure the long-term preservation and vitality of agricultural land, ss. 1, 63 (new s. 79.0.6) and explanatory notes (Publications du Québec), Bill 86, SQ 2025, c. 5, explanatory notes and s. 63 (new s. 79.0.6), Bill 86, SQ 2025, c. 5, explanatory notes, Bas-Saint-Laurent, Accueil et intégration; Place aux jeunes en région, ARTERRE, Régions participantes: Bas-Saint-Laurent, Bill 86, new ss. 79.0.6 and 79.0.12; s. 105.5 and Schedule B, Bill 86, new s. 79.0.12, Wolastoqiyik Wahsipekuk First Nation; Listuguj, About; Mi'gmawei Mawiomi Secretariat, 4 June 2026. Verified 5 October 2026 · confidence in this entry: medium.
Climate and water context
Climate class (Köppen-Geiger)
Shares are the fraction of the footprint land area in each class at 1 km; sea and no-data cells are excluded.
Source: Beck et al. 2023, Köppen-Geiger maps at 1 km · CC BY 4.0
Water (WRI Aqueduct classes, as published)
WRI Aqueduct 4.0 indicators in WRI's own classes; this project does not combine or rescale them.
Source: WRI Aqueduct 4.0 · CC BY 4.0
Where legal and cost questions come first
These are the questions a community has to be able to answer in a place: who may hold the land, how a group can hold it together, and what it costs. Read them as context for a conversation with the people already there, not as a verdict on the place.
Legal and ownership
- Foreign ownership
- restricted Non-residents of Québec need CPTAQ authorization to acquire farm land of 4 hectares or more, or shares in a company whose principal asset is farm land where the transfer makes it a non-resident corporation (art. 8 and 10) (Act respecting the acquisition of farm land by non-residents, A-4.1, as amended by SQ 2025, c. 5); Bill 86 also requires it for investment funds and holdings above a regulated cap.
- Collective ownership path
- Not verified for this region: no source on collective-ownership vehicles was opened
- Several households on one holding
- not as of right
- Residency needed to buy
- residency required in some cases
- Where building is decided
- CPTAQ authorization for any non-agricultural use and for an additional residence or dwelling on a lot with acquired residential rights (Bill 86), plus the MRC land-use plan and the municipal permit
- First-claim holders
- CPTAQ (authorization gate over non-resident, investment-fund and above-cap acquisitions of farm land)
- Key restriction
- CPTAQ farm-land regime as tightened by Bill 86 (SQ 2025, c. 5, assented 25 March 2025): authorization is required where the acquirer is an investment fund, where the acquirer will not register a farm operation and the land lies within 1 km of an urbanization perimeter in an MRC of the interim Schedule B groups A to D (in this region Rimouski-Neigette and Rivière-du-Loup), and above a regulated holding cap once regulated; the declaration that the land will be a registered farm operation within a year secures authorization under ground 2 (s. 79.0.12)
- Legal direction
- tightening Bill 86 grounds 1 and 2 have effect from 5 December 2024; ground 3 (cap) waits for a regulation; the group decree under s. 79.0.5 was not found, so the interim Schedule B groups apply as of the Act's text; the other six MRCs (La Mitis, Kamouraska, Témiscouata, Les Basques, La Matanie, La Matapédia) are in interim group F and outside ground 2 until a decree says otherwise
Source: Publications du Québec, SQ 2025, c. 5 (Bill 86), official text opened 2026-10-04 (opens in a new tab) · medium confidence
Known gaps. Decree under s. 79.0.5 and the holding-cap regulation not retrievable; full s. 1 definition of 'non-resident' in A-4.1 not opened (legisquebec 403/502, CanLII 403; art. 2, 8 and 15.2 read via a Wayback capture of 2025-05-24); the federal non-Canadian residential purchase ban and collective-ownership vehicles (Civil Code) not verified and therefore not stated
Land cost
- Price band
- price not read
- Price trajectory
- rising Provincial: +67% from 2019 to 2025 (6,656 to 11,131 CAD per acre, Statistics Canada 32-10-0047-01) and +4.6% from 2024 to 2025; FCC reports Québec +4.8% for 2025. Radio-Canada (2019) reported regional prices had doubled in five years. No regional series after 2019 was found.
- Detail
- No official, current Bas-Saint-Laurent price per hectare was found. The only regional figure (La Financière agricole du Québec, quoted by Radio-Canada, 16 December 2019: 6,000-6,500 CAD per hectare versus 20,000-22,000 provincially) is stale and is not shipped as a price. Province-wide context, Statistics Canada table 32-10-0047-01 (farm land and buildings, July 1): Québec 6,656 CAD per acre in 2019 and 11,131 in 2025.
Source: Statistics Canada 32-10-0047-01; FCC Farmland Values Report (2025 page); Radio-Canada 16 Dec 2019 citing La Financière agricole du Québec (opens in a new tab) · low confidence
Known gaps. Regional per-hectare price unavailable; FCC publishes provincial figures only; La Financière agricole regional series not located.
Practical fit
Hospital access
- Nearest hospital
- 24.53 km CLSC du Cabano, straight line from the region centre
- Hospitals within 50 km
- 4
- Hospitals within 100 km
- 12
- 60-minute proxy
- within 60 minutes a straight-line proxy, not a road time
Geodesic km from region centroid to nearest OSM hospital, not a 60-minute road-network isochrone. The centroid may fall on a regional hub city (Oaxaca City, Santiago, Bolzano, Taos, Evora) rather than a target rural settlement site, so a low number can reflect centroid placement more than real rural-settlement access. V2 to refine via road-time isochrones.
Demographics
- Population trend
- growing Statistics Canada July 1 estimates for the eight census divisions: 203,798 (2001), 197,170 (2019), 199,319 (2021), 204,755 (2025): -3.3% over 2001-2019, then +3.8% over 2019-2025; every MRC grew 2021-2025 (+0.9% La Matapédia to +4.9% Rimouski-Neigette). The long-run level is still near 2001.
- Median age
- aging fast 2021 Census median age by MRC 46.8 (Rivière-du-Loup) to 56.8 (Les Basques), Québec 43.2; 65 and over 27.6% (23.7% in 2016; Québec 20.6%).
- Migration
- more people arriving than leaving 2023/2024, eight census divisions: births 1,413, deaths 2,445 (natural decrease 1,032); net intraprovincial +747, net interprovincial +44, immigrants 285, net non-permanent residents +1,794. Intraprovincial inflow peaked at +1,602 in 2020/2021; it was slightly negative in 2015/2016 to 2017/2018 (-2, -169, -132).
- Rural density
- low density 9.0 p/km² by the 2021 census (199,039 on 22,188 km²), about 6.0 outside the cities of Rimouski and Rivière-du-Loup; MRC densities 3.3 (La Matapédia) to 27.7 (Rivière-du-Loup).
Source: Statistics Canada tables 98-10-0002-01, 98-10-0022-01, 17-10-0152-01, 17-10-0153-01 (opens in a new tab) · high confidence
Known gaps. 2026 Census not yet released; 2023/2024 components are the latest published; migration by age not analysed.
Field reality, water and soil
Water source control
- Rights regime
- Québec: surface water and groundwater are 'part of the common heritage of the Québec nation' (SQ 2009, c. 21, s. 1); withdrawals of 75,000 litres per day or more need ministerial authorization under the Environment Quality Act (s. 31.75), authorizations are transferable (s. 31.84)
- Rights holder
- state
- Single-entity control
- low The 2009 Act makes water a collective resource that cannot be appropriated beyond Civil Code art. 913 conditions, and projected 2050 stress is Low to low-medium (area-weighted 0.079). Local control by a single holder was not analysed: no municipal, bottled-water or irrigation withdrawal data for the eight MRCs were opened.
- When water is short
- Environment Quality Act s. 31.76 (inserted 2009): every authorization decision 'must give priority to satisfying public health, sanitation, civil protection and drinking water supply needs' and must reconcile aquatic-ecosystem needs with agriculture, industry, energy and recreation; s. 31.77 adds the effect on other persons' and municipalities' water-use rights. No regional drought-priority rule was opened
Source: Québec, An Act to affirm the collective nature of water resources (SQ 2009, c. 21); WRI Aqueduct 4.0 (opens in a new tab) · medium confidence
Known gaps. Regulation (RPEP, Q-2, r. 35.2) not opened; well yields and municipal supply sources not researched.
Soil contamination
- Known contamination
- legacy industrial GTC register records inside the eight MRCs: 345 sites (343 point and 2 surface records) with 382 case files, 3.3% of the 10,506 point records province-wide; 307 file rehabilitations are completed, 23 initiated, 46 not started, 6 not necessary; contaminant text is dominated by petroleum hydrocarbons (429 mentions in the file fields) with PAH 79 mentions; sites by MRC: Rimouski-Neigette 87, Rivière-du-Loup 61, Témiscouata 50, Kamouraska 39, La Mitis 30. The pattern is town fuel and commercial sites, not a single mining or industrial legacy; the register is 'not an exhaustive inventory' and does not capture agricultural-input legacy such as pesticide residues
- Contamination register
- public register
- Due-diligence burden
- moderate
- Regulatory regime
- Québec Environment Quality Act (CQLR c. Q-2) contaminated-land regime, with the MELCCFP 'Répertoire des terrains contaminés' (GTC system) published as open data (CC BY 4.0, updated 2026-10-02); the Act's s. 31.68 list is referenced by the open-data catalogue. The Land Protection and Rehabilitation Policy was not opened
Source: MELCCFP, Répertoire des terrains contaminés (GTC), Données Québec (CC BY 4.0) (opens in a new tab) · medium confidence
Known gaps. Pre-research suggested legacy agriculture; the register shows hydrocarbon sites instead and holds no agricultural-input records, so agricultural legacy is unknown, not absent. Policy text and notice-in-land-register rules not opened.
Climate buffering, state and trajectory
Buffering features (state)
- Primary features
- altitude forest canopy
- Altitude range
- 0 to about 930 (Global Solar Atlas elevations at 315 sample points; p10-p90 134-484 m)
- Buffering strength
- moderate
- Detail
- 84% of the footprint was forest of 30% canopy or more in 2000 (Hansen) and the foothill ridges rise to about 930 m. Coastal moderation by the estuary is plausible but was not measured or sourced, so it is not listed as a feature.
Trajectory under warming
- Direction
- buffering falling Observed state plus trajectory: Hansen forest loss 0.37-0.84% a year in 2001-2012 and 0.51-1.03% a year in 2013-2023 (net -3.4 %/decade); Ouranos gives +2 to 3 °C by 2050 for southern Québec under SSP3-7.0 relative to 1991-2020. Winter warming, freeze-thaw, estuary ice-cover loss and coastal erosion (an expectation from pre-research) were not verified from an opened source and are left out.
- Primary vulnerability
- Warming of about 3.3 °C from the 1970-2000 baseline (2.0 °C) to 2041-2060 (5.3 °C, SSP2-4.5 ensemble), and a spruce-budworm outbreak mapped here from 2012 (9,436 ha) and 2013 (61,184 ha) alongside canopy loss that rose about 60% after 2013
Source: WorldClim CMIP6 v2.1; Hansen GFC v1.11; MRNF Québec spruce budworm aerial survey; Ouranos (opens in a new tab) · medium confidence
Known gaps. Estuary ice-cover, coastal erosion and winter-warming figures for Bas-Saint-Laurent not sourced; WorldClim baseline period (1970-2000) differs from Ouranos' (1991-2020).